Best Lens For Streaming – 7 Amazing Camera Lenses (2023)

Updated On:

So you bought a camera, and now you need a lens? Welcome to a world of sweet, sweet torment. The items I am going to go through in this review are all great lenses. Each and every one of them is not only a good streaming lens but a good lens in general.

If I need to pick one, it would be Sony E PZ 16-50mm because of its versatility and internal focus, giving great results when streaming.

Knowing what a certain lens entails is a small science. That is why I did this review to provide you with enough information to ensure your purchase is good.

QUICK OVERVIEW: Best Lens for Streaming

Sony E PZ
Sony E PZ
  • 16-50mm focal length
  • Internal focus
Sony SEL35F18
Sony SEL35F18
  • Full metal construction
  • Bit Depth/Sample Rate: 16-bit/48kHz
Sigma 16mm
Sigma 16mm f/1.4
  • 16mm prime lens
  • Aperture: 1.4


When I first started to dabble in photography around 2010, I wished there were more reviews like this one. I would’ve known way better and sooner what my needs were, or I would’ve at least learned a thing or two passively.

Things like what’s bokeh, how to get it, what’s exposure, shutter speed, or how to always set up your lenses and settings correctly in manual mode in any light condition.

I learned it the hard way, but now you don’t have to! I’ll cover the basics here.

I won’t go into the nitty-gritty and the aforementioned optics, but I can promise that you will come out a bit more informed about photography in general.

Who knows, you might even branch out into photography after this!

1. Sony E PZ 16-50mm

Best lens for streaming overall

Sony E PZ 16-50mm

Stefan’s Take:

Its lightweight, retractable mid-range zoom is great for streaming. You will also get a power zoom for smooth and silent zooming.

Aspherical elements on this lens minimize distortion, and you also get superior contrast, resolution, and color fidelity from ED (Extra-low Dispersion) glass elements.

9.4
Sharpness 9.4
Sensor Quality 9.5
Low-Light Condition 9.4
Price 9.2

Why do I think Sony E PZ 16-50mm is the best camera lens among these?

The Sony E PZ 16-50mm is what we call a zoom lens. The hint about it being a zoom lens (contrary to a prime lens, which I’ll cover in one of the later entries) is in that 16-50mm range.

The lower the millimeter count, the wider the angle. So, a 16-50mm lens would offer a range from a wide angle to a more narrow portrait angle.

That option doesn’t really come in handy when you’re looking for a lens to fit on your streaming camera. It is going to spend the vast majority of its working time mounted on a webcam tripod with a preset focal length and fixed lighting conditions.

You don’t really need it to be capable of any kind of zoom, but it’s a nice feature to have, nevertheless.

The one very important feature this lens has, and one you should definitely keep an eye out for in any other streaming lens, is that it has internal autofocus.

This means that the lens itself has an internal motor that rotates the rings in cooperation with the camera body and its algorithms to keep you in focus at all times.

When the camera is off, the length of the lens is just 3 cm. It also has a fast, silent AF motor and optical image stabilization.

An extra-low dispersion glass element is included in the design to reduce color fringing and
chromatic aberrations. That way, users got much better clarity and neutrality of the colors.

Pros
  • Relatively cheap
  • Versatile
  • Internal focus
Cons
  • None, as far as streaming quality goes

2. Sony SEL35F18

Lens with the best aperture

Sony SEL35F18

Stefan’s Take:

The Sony SEL35F18 is a prime lens. It has a fixed focal length of 35mm.

35mm is considered rather wide, so it’s a really good lens to have if you need it on your desk, but you also need it to catch more than just your head, for example.

9.1
Sharpness 9.0
Sensor Quality 9.2
Low-Light Condition 9.3
Price 8.8

This is a prime lens. I mentioned them in the entry above. What this basically means is that it has a fixed focal length. That’s the thing that’s being marked in millimeters.

Some people say that a prime lens will always yield better image quality and sharpness, but some people don’t. It’s one of those eternal debates.

For me, personally, it does sound a bit logical that a highly specified lens, with just one focal length, would fare better than a more universal one.

That doesn’t really have to do much with photography and photography-related things but rather with my experience with various universal gadgets, regardless of what they’re for.

It is my experience that universality almost always comes at the cost of performance.

Sony SEL35F18 has the same internal focus mechanism as the lens above, so you’ll be privy to Sony’s amazing autofocus.

One of the best features it boasts, tho, is its maximum aperture, which stands at 1.8.

The marking you can identify the aperture with is that f/x.x format you can see in the name of this and many other lenses.

It is now time to explain the aperture numbers. Namely, the smaller the number, the larger the aperture. It’s a little bit counterintuitive, but that’s photography for you.

So, the larger the aperture (the smaller the number), the more light enters your camera at once. What that means for you is that you need less light to get a well-lit image.

You can now begin to see how a large aperture is a nice thing to have.

Pros
  • Affordable lens
  • Internal focus
  • Large aperture
  • Reasonably sharp
Cons
  • Shallow depth of field at maximum aperture

3. Sigma 16mm f/1.4

Best lens for low light conditions

Sigma 16mm f_1.4

Stefan’s Take:

This lens has FLD and SLD optical elements that enable superior optical characteristics. The maximum aperture of F/1.4 makes it ideal for photography in poor light conditions.

It also has an ultra-fast and quiet autofocus motor. It is resistant to various weather influences.

9.1
Sharpness 9.1
Sensor Quality 9.0
Low-Light Condition 9.5
Price 8.7

An aperture of 1.4 makes it extremely sensitive to light, and thus it has excellent low-light performance. Of course, the fact that it can illuminate your face doesn’t mean that you won’t need an additional light source for peak performance.

Depth of field means how much of the space in front of your camera will be in focus. The larger the aperture, the more shallow that space gets.

So, to put it simply – you get more light, but less of the space in front of the camera can be in focus, or you get less light, but more things are going to be in focus in front of the camera and behind you.

A more shallow depth of field will give you a nicer bokeh (the nice blurry background in professional photos), but it would also mean that it can be so shallow that, while your eyes are in focus, your nose might not be. That’s how shallow it gets at apertures such as 1.4.

Three F Low Dispersion (FLD) and two Special Low Dispersion (SLD) elements reduce chromatic aberrations and color fringing to accomplish better color accuracy and clarity.

The manufacturer included a super multi-layer coating to minimize ghosting and lens flare. That way, you will get color-neutral and rich-in-contrast images.

Pros
  • Portrait lens
  • Sharper image quality than others
  • Wide-angle lens
Cons
  • Sigma 16mm f1.4 is a bit more expensive
  • Shallow focus

4. Sigma Art 50mm f1.4

Lens with the best image quality

Sigma Art 50mm f1.4

Stefan’s Take:

Sigma Art lenses have been a standard in portrait photography for a number of years, and rightfully so.

This lens is a fast standard-length prime designed to achieve high optical performance by incorporating three Special Low Dispersion glass elements and one molded glass aspherical element.

9.0
Sharpness 9.2
Sensor Quality 9.6
Low-Light Condition 9.3
Price 8.0

If you browse through any fashion magazine you find, the cover photo was probably shot using a variant of this lens, if not this very lens.

As is the case with any standard-setting piece of equipment, the not-so-small price tag is also present.

This lens is designed for full-frame and APS-C DSLR cameras. It has an ultra-fast and quiet autofocus motor.

A 50mm lens is significantly less wide than the last entry. So, if you don’t have enough desk space for you to be located a bit further away from the camera, this will not do the trick for you. It requires that there’s some distance between it and the subject.

That being said, if it suits your workspace, this lens probably has the best image quality on this list.

A 50mm F1.4 large-aperture lens offers an angle of view similar to human vision, a stunning bokeh effect, and superior versatility.

Not only will it be sharp, but it will also influence the colors you get. Even in low light conditions, the 1.4 aperture does the trick, and you won’t have any issues with your blacks and shadows being too dark.

Pros
  • Great lens for streaming, if you have the conditions
  • Quiet autofocus motor
Cons
  • Steep price

5. Tamron 28-200mm

Best zoom lens

Tamron 28-200mm

Stefan’s Take:

As far as I know, Tamron lenses can be and are used in all kinds of photography and videography. That many colleagues can’t be extremely wrong, can they?

The lens is sharp and does its job, but both a 28mm prime lens and a 200mm prime lens would be way better.

8.7
Sharpness 8.7
Sensor Quality 8.9
Low-Light Condition 9.1
Price 8.2

Now might also be the time to talk about constant aperture. Do you see how the name of this lens shows a range of apertures (2.8-5.6)?

That means that it can only have its maximum aperture (2.8) at its lowest zoom level (28mm in this case). The more you zoom it in, the more the aperture closes, and the less light your lens can let through to your Sony camera.

Constant aperture would mean that it doesn’t change with zoom. That feature is extremely sought after and even more extremely expensive. It sets premium lenses apart from regular DSLR lenses. This lens, sadly, doesn’t boast that feature.

The feature it has, though, is a huge range of focal lengths. 28mm is a pretty wide angle, and 200mm is so narrow that you can take a picture of a bird in flight a couple of hundred feet away.

Furthermore, its range is not something you, as a streamer, would necessarily need. You would probably be using it on just the zoomed-out position of 28mm.

It does, however, offer you the possibility to take up photography a bit more seriously. Especially wildlife, since you don’t need to get too close to it, with a 200mm zoom.

Pros
  • Versatile
  • Durable
Cons
  • Heavy

6. Sony – FE 16-35mm

The best lens for professionals

Sony - FE 16-35mm

Stefan’s Take:

The Sony FE 16-35mm is a highly professional tool with a highly professional price tag.

Aside from being suitable for streaming and video in general, this kind of wide-angle lens is also very nice for landscape photography.

9.0
Sharpness 9.3
Sensor Quality 9.6
Low-Light Condition 9.5
Price 7.5

It’s extremely hard to design an excellent ultra-wide-angle lens, which is also a zoom lens, and Sony did a great job on this one.

This is the most expensive lens on this list. That being said, its price is more than justified by its performance.

One of the main reasons for its price is that it has that elusive feature – constant aperture. It holds a 2.8 aperture throughout its 16-35mm focal range.

Although I am not used to a wide-angle lens having any kind of depth of field, this one can provide even a nice bokeh, if zoomed in to the maximum focal length. That is due to its large aperture.

Its body is made of polycarbonate and has a sleek black finish to go well with your Sony streaming camera and other possible items in your Sony lens collection.

It is also a part of Sony’s G Master series, which is a designation for their top-notch quality items.

Pros
  • Premium lens
  • Constant aperture
  • Wide-angle
  • Dust and moisture resistance
Cons
  • No internal image stabilization
  • Astronomical price

7. Meike 35mm F1.4

Best lens under $100

Meike 35mm F1.4

Stefan’s Take:

This is a good example of a trade-off that can be crucial but lowers the price significantly.

This lens has impeccable performance when you look at the numbers. Some shortcomings get visible when you start digging through the data, though.

8.5
Sharpness 8.0
Sensor Quality 8.5
Low-Light Condition 8.1
Price 9.5

At 35mm and f1.4, this sounds like a lens that would normally cost more than $500. And it would if it had any other brand name aside from Meike.

But it’s not just the brand name, there’s one huge shortcoming with this lens. No autofocus.

This means that using the example of a streamer, you would have to mount your camera on a tripod, adjust the focus manually so that you’d be in focus where you’re normally sitting, and not move an inch while talking into the camera.

Autofocus, combined with your camera’s algorithm, would do easy work out of following your movements, but this will downright ignore you and just stick to the field of focus you’ve previously set.

Given its aperture of 1.4, that means that its depth of field is extremely low, and you’d probably spend more time out of focus, than in focus.

If you’re not one to wiggle a lot while you speak to your audience, this isn’t of any bother. But if you are… Ouch.

Pros
  • Highly affordable
  • Wide-angle lens
  • Aperture 1.4 excels in low-light conditions
Cons
  • No autofocus

What To Look For In Camera Lenses For Streaming

It’s the same with any other lens, really. You should be on the lookout for sharpness, low light performance, affordability, and practical use when trying to figure out which is the best camera lens for you.

Also, keep a keen eye out for your camera lens is compatible with a full-frame camera, or an APS-C camera, because there is a difference in sensor surface. That translates into different focal lengths.

A lens may have, for example, a 10mm focal length (that would be an ultra-wide-angle lens) on a full-frame camera, but that would translate into 15mm on an APS-C camera. The ratio is between 1.5 and 1.6x, depending on the brand.

Sharpness

Sharpness is what makes the main difference between regular lenses and the best lenses. Of course, you’ll know which one is the best lens for streaming only if you test it against your needs, but there is some info you can ascertain, even from reviews like this.

Some of the key features are:

  1. Optics brand (Household names like Leika, or Carl Zeiss are the ones to look out for)
  2. High aperture (f-number less than 3.5) lenses have sharper images in general

Besides that, the sharpness of your stream video or photography will, in the end, depend on your knowledge.

You will be able to record video footage that would show up well on any computer screen if you follow these pointers.

Low-Light performance

This depends solely on a large aperture, as far as the lens goes. The sensor in the camera itself can help a lot in this regard, too, but that’s not our focus right now.

If you expect poor lighting, you should go for lenses that have a larger aperture than 2.8. That means any number that’s lower than 2.8 would make for a good choice.

Affordability

This is more of a balancing act than anything else, really. Affordable lenses have numerous trade-offs compared to premium ones.

Either the aperture will be smaller, the build quality will be lackluster, or a number of other, seemingly small things can really make your video quality suffer.

In the end, you can do wonders depending on your settings, your DSLR camera, and your skill, but there are some boundaries that cannot be crossed without investing some serious cash into your glass.

Practical use

What I meant by “practical use” is that you should know what you want to do with the lens.

Some lenses might look nice, provide great image quality, or come at a nice price, but they are, for example, 200-600mm.

A streamer would have absolutely no use with such a lens. It’s a lot more oriented toward nature photography. Those are the lenses that take those impressive close-ups of eagles, or such photos.

They aren’t really close-ups. The photographer was probably hundreds of feet away from the animal when they snapped that pic. The lens they use just has a powerful zoom feature.

Conclusion

For the end of this test, my final list will be:

  1. Sony E PZ 16-50mm – the best lens for streaming,
  2. Sony SEL35F18 – lens with the best price-to-quality ratio,
  3. Sigma 16mm f/1.4 – best lens if you are streaming in low-light conditions.

So, be on the lookout for what’s called a wide-angle lens. Image stabilization, on the other hand, isn’t of key importance.

Your camera will almost always be mounted on a tripod, and that makes image stabilization pretty much redundant. It becomes a factor when you record video with your camera in hand.

FAQ

What type of lens is best for streaming?

If I had to generalize, I’d say any lens with a lower focal length than 50mm. Of course, the aperture and other things matter, too, but a lens at +50mm would be pretty hard to set up in your room, given its zoom factor.

What lens do most YouTubers use?

I’d say it’s one of the Sigma lenses. Probably a wide-angle lens, too. If you want to achieve the video quality of your favorite YouTubers, Sigma 16mm f1.4 would be a great fit.

It will catch both you and some of your immediate surroundings from a short distance. It’s razor-sharp and has a large aperture.

Is DSLR or mirrorless better for streaming?

This isn’t a lens-related question per se, but it’s an important one, nevertheless. The answer is that mirrorless cameras always give videos of a higher quality than a DSLR camera would.

That, however, brings your bandwidth into question. The better the video quality, the larger the file you’re streaming.

So, if your bandwidth limits you in any way, a lower-quality DSLR camera with a matching DSLR lens would be a better choice.

If not, then feel free to go mirrorless because it’s most definitely the future of video production.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Stefan

Stefan is a long-time content creator and one of the Stream Mentor's co-founders. He's a tech geek and a Dota 2 player (not even a good one) who wanted to help others become professional streamers and earn from the comfort of their home.

Follow me on:

Twitter

Instagram

LinkedIn