Two of the most popular microphones in the industry are the Electro-Voice RE320 and RE20. 

Both microphones are valued for their audio quality and durability, yet they possess different strengths and weaknesses. 

The Electro Voice RE320 mic delivers clear, articulate audio, making it ideal for voiceovers and podcasting. Its cardioid pickup pattern effectively minimizes wind noise. 

Conversely, the RE20 is more suitable for individuals who require a reliable microphone capable of handling high sound pressure levels. 

So, which microphone is best for your needs? Let's take a closer look at our RE320 vs. RE20 guide.

Re320 vs Re20 Guide

Re320

Re20

Audio Quality RE20 vs RE320

The Re320 is a dynamic cardioid microphone designed for live audio and recording applications. With its rugged construction and tailored frequency response, the Re320 is ideal for use in a wide range of settings. 

There is no doubt that the Re320 and the Re20 are outstanding microphones. Both provide exceptional sound quality and are regarded as some of the finest microphones available today. 

However, when comparing the Re320 to the Re20, there are several key differences that should be taken into account. 

Re320 versus Re20

Firstly, the Re320 is more suitable for live settings, whereas the Re20 is better suited for studio environments.

Additionally, keep in mind that if you wish to connect the Re320 to a computer, you will need an audio interface for streaming to convert the analog signal into a digital format.

Another notable difference is that the RE320 is a dynamic microphone, whereas the RE20 is a ribbon microphone. Therefore, the RE320 is more versatile than the RE20, particularly if you plan to do a podcast. 

It can be utilized for a broader range of applications, including vocals, kick drums, and guitar.

The RE20 is more suitable for use in a studio environment, where it can effectively record instruments like piano, horns, and strings. 

Finally, the Re320 includes a pop filter feature that eliminates plosive sounds, enhancing the quality of the recorded voices.

Re320 vs Re20 Vocals

There are various opinions regarding the best vocal mic: the re320 or the re20. Some individuals claim that the re320 offers more natural audio, while others favor the re20 for its greater power.

So, how does the RE320 compare to the RE20? First of all, the RE320 provides several enhancements over its predecessor. 

To begin with, the RE320 offers a broader frequency response, making it more suitable for capturing a wider variety of sound sources.

It also features a more sensitive pickup pattern, which helps reduce noise and enhance clarity. This improvement is made possible by the neodymium-magnet structure and thinner diaphragm, which enable faster transient response and a stronger output.

The RE320 offers an enhancement in audio quality compared to the RE20. It produces warmer, richer sound, making it ideal for capturing vocals and instruments.

Additionally, the Re320 features a switch that allows you to select different voices for various applications.

However, both of these microphones are excellent for vocals, ultimately depending on personal preference.

FAQ

What's the difference between RE20 and RE320?

The RE320 and RE20 are two of the most popular studio microphones available. Both feature a cardioid polar pattern, but they have some key differences. 

The RE320 has a larger diaphragm and a higher maximum audio pressure level, making it better suited for capturing high-end sounds. In contrast, the RE20 has a more extended frequency response, which makes it better for capturing low and midrange sounds. 
The RE320 also has a higher output level and a wider frequency response than the RE20. Additionally, it includes a built-in limiter to help protect your audio signal from clipping. 

The RE320 is an excellent choice for recordings with a significant dynamic range, while the RE20 is preferable for vocals or other sources that require a more focused sound.

In summary, the RE20 is designed for voice and instrument applications, while the RE320 is optimized for use with bass instruments. 
Moreover, the RE320 features a built-in bass roll-off control that allows you to tailor the microphone's response to match the instrument or voice you are recording.

Regarding price, the RE320 is more affordable than the RE20, making it a great option for those on a budget.
Keep in mind that both microphones utilize variable D technology, which reduces the proximity effect.
Ultimately, the choice between these two microphones depends on the types of sounds you wish to capture.

Does RE20 need a Cloudlifter?

No, the RE20 does not require a Cloudlifter. The Cloudlifter is a device designed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of a microphone-level signal. 

The RE20 already has a high signal-to-noise ratio, so a Cloudlifter is unnecessary.
The Cloudlifter CL-1 by Cloud Microphones is intended for use with ribbon microphones. 

The Cloudlifter CL-1 is a small, hand-held device that connects to the ribbon microphone and provides up to 25dB of clean gain. 
This allows the microphone to be used in various settings, including recording studios, live performances, radio, and more.

Does EV RE320 need a Cloudlifter?

Recently, there has been considerable discussion in the audio community regarding the Cloudlifter, a device that many claim is essential for achieving the best sound from an EV RE320 microphone. 

But does the Cloudlifter work with this mic, or is it merely a waste of money? Let's take a closer look at the Cloudlifter and find out.
The Electro-Voice RE320 is a popular dynamic microphone frequently used for vocals and instruments in both studio and stage settings. It is known for its clear sound and ability to handle high sound pressure levels. 
But does the RE320 need a Cloudlifter? 

Regarding whether an EV RE320 requires a Cloudlifter, the answer is yes. 
A Cloudlifter will provide the RE320 with the extra boost it needs to be heard clearly in any situation, such as during podcasting.

What is RE20 good for?

Firstly, the Electro-Voice RE20 is a cardioid microphone that was first released in 197. It is often used for voiceover, radio, and television broadcasts. 

The RE20 is also well-known for studio recording and live sound reinforcement. It is recognized for its strong output and clarity in the mid and high frequencies.

Overall, the Electro-Voice RE20 is a popular choice for broadcast and voiceover applications. It is a cardioid dynamic microphone celebrated for its clear sound and low noise. 

The RE20 is durable and can handle high sound pressure levels without requiring phantom power.
It is a favorite among broadcasters and sound professionals for its clarity, punch, and versatility.
Finally, the RE20 is favored by live sound engineers and has been used on stage by Bruce Springsteen, Mick Jagger, and Bono. 

Final Word

There is no definitive winner when comparing the Re320 and Re20 microphones. 

Both microphones have distinct strengths and weaknesses, which ultimately depend on personal preference. Some individuals may favor the warmer sound of the RE20, while others might prefer the more neutral tone of the RE320. 

Ultimately, it is the individual's choice to determine which microphone sounds better.

We hope you enjoyed our comparison of the RE20 and RE320 microphones in our guide, which covers the technology, differences in audio quality, vocal performance, and pricing.