Two of the most popular microphones in the industry are the Electro-Voice RE320 and RE20.
Both microphones are valued for their audio quality and durability, yet they possess different strengths and weaknesses.
The Electro Voice RE320 mic delivers clear, articulate audio, making it ideal for voiceovers and podcasting. Its cardioid pickup pattern effectively minimizes wind noise.
Conversely, the RE20 is more suitable for individuals who require a reliable microphone capable of handling high sound pressure levels.
So, which microphone is best for your needs? Let’s take a closer look at our RE320 vs. RE20 guide.
Table of Contents
Re320 vs Re20 Guide
Re320
- Generating Element: Dynamic N/Dym Magnet Structure
- Frequency Response: 30 Hz – 18,000 Hz (kick curve) 45 Hz – 18,000 Hz (general curve)
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid
- Impedance: 150 ohms balanced
- Sensitivity, Open Circuit Voltage, 1 kHz: 2.5 mV/pascal
- Hum Pickup Level, typical (60 Hz/1 millioersted field): -130 dBm
- Polarity: Pin 2 will be positive referenced to Pin 3 with positive pressure on the diaphragm
- Case Material: Steel
- Dimensions: Length = 216.7 mm (8.53 in) Widest Diameter = 54.4 mm (2.14 in) Body Diameter = 49.2 mm (1.94 in)
- Finish: Semi-Gloss Black
- Net Weight: 681 g (1 lb, 8 oz)
- Shipping Weight: 1503 g (3 lb, 5 oz)
- Accessories Furnished: 81715 stand clamp
- Optional Accessories: WSPL-2 Foam Wind Screen 309A Isolation Mount
Re20
- Element Type: Dynamic
- Frequency Response: 45 Hz – 18,000 Hz
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid
- Impedance: 150 ohms balanced
- Sensitivity, Open Circuit Voltage, 1 kHz: 1.5 mV/pascal
- Hum Pickup Level, typical (60 Hz/1 millioersted field): -130 dBm
- Polarity: Pin 2 will be positive referenced to Pin 3 with positive pressure on the diaphragm
- Case Material: Steel
- Finish: Fawn beige
- Dimensions: Length = 8.53u0022 (216.7 mm) Widest Diameter = 2.14u0022 (54.4 mm) Body Diameter = 1.94u0022 (49.2 mm)
- Net Weight: 1 lb, 10 oz (737 g)
- Shipping Weight: 3 lb, 4 oz (1474 g)
- Accessories Included: 81715 stand clamp
- Optional Accessories: 309A shock-mounted stand adapter for use with floor stand or recording boom arm
Audio Quality RE20 vs RE320
The Re320 is a dynamic cardioid microphone designed for live audio and recording applications. With its rugged construction and tailored frequency response, the Re320 is ideal for use in a wide range of settings.
There is no doubt that the Re320 and the Re20 are outstanding microphones. Both provide exceptional sound quality and are regarded as some of the finest microphones available today.
However, when comparing the Re320 to the Re20, there are several key differences that should be taken into account.
Firstly, the Re320 is more suitable for live settings, whereas the Re20 is better suited for studio environments.
Additionally, keep in mind that if you wish to connect the Re320 to a computer, you will need an audio interface for streaming to convert the analog signal into a digital format.
Another notable difference is that the RE320 is a dynamic microphone, whereas the RE20 is a ribbon microphone. Therefore, the RE320 is more versatile than the RE20, particularly if you plan to do a podcast.
It can be utilized for a broader range of applications, including vocals, kick drums, and guitar.
The RE20 is more suitable for use in a studio environment, where it can effectively record instruments like piano, horns, and strings.
Finally, the Re320 includes a pop filter feature that eliminates plosive sounds, enhancing the quality of the recorded voices.
Re320 vs Re20 Vocals
There are various opinions regarding the best vocal mic: the re320 or the re20. Some individuals claim that the re320 offers more natural audio, while others favor the re20 for its greater power.
So, how does the RE320 compare to the RE20? First of all, the RE320 provides several enhancements over its predecessor.
To begin with, the RE320 offers a broader frequency response, making it more suitable for capturing a wider variety of sound sources.
It also features a more sensitive pickup pattern, which helps reduce noise and enhance clarity. This improvement is made possible by the neodymium-magnet structure and thinner diaphragm, which enable faster transient response and a stronger output.
The RE320 offers an enhancement in audio quality compared to the RE20. It produces warmer, richer sound, making it ideal for capturing vocals and instruments.
Additionally, the Re320 features a switch that allows you to select different voices for various applications.
However, both of these microphones are excellent for vocals, ultimately depending on personal preference.
FAQ
Whats the difference between RE20 and RE320?
The Re320 vs Re20 are two of the most popular studio microphones on the market. They are both microphones with a cardioid polar pattern, but they have some key differences. The Re320 has a larger diaphragm and a higher maximum audio pressure level, making it better for capturing high-end sounds. The Re20 has a more extended frequency response, making it better for capturing low and midrange sounds. u003cbru003eThe RE320 has a higher output level and a wider frequency response than the RE20. It also has a built-in limiter to help protect your audio signal from clipping. The RE320 is an excellent choice for recordings with a lot of dynamic range, while the RE20 is a better choice for vocals or other sources that need a more focused sound.To sum it up, the RE20 is designed for voice and instrument applications, while the RE320 is optimized for use with bass instruments. u003cbru003eIn addition, the RE320 also has a built-in bass roll-off control that lets you tailor the microphone’s response to match the instrument or voice you’re recording.When it comes to the price, the RE320 is also more affordable than the RE20. So, this makes it a great option for those on a budget.u003cbru003eRemember, both these mics have variable d technology, decreasing the proximity effect.u003cbru003eUltimately, choosing these two microphones depends on what kind of sounds you are trying to capture.
Does RE20 need a Cloudlifter?
No, the RE20 does not need a Cloudlifter. The Cloudlifter is a device that is designed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of a microphone-level signal. The RE20 already has a high signal-to-noise ratio, so a Cloudlifter is unnecessary.u003cbru003eThe Cloudlifter CL-1 by Cloud Microphones is a device that is designed to be used with ribbon microphones. The Cloudlifter CL-1 is a small, hand-held device that connects to the ribbon microphone and provides up to 25db of clean gain. u003cbru003eThis allows the microphone to be used in various settings, such as recording studios, live performances, radio, and more.
Does EV RE320 need a Cloudlifter?
Lately, there has been a lot of discussion in the audio community about the Cloudlifter, a device that many claim is essential for getting the best sound out of an EV RE320 microphone. But does the Cloudlifter work with this mic, or is it just a waste of money? Let’s take a closer look at the Cloudlifter and find out.u003cbru003eThe Electro-Voice RE320 is a popular dynamic microphone often used for vocals and instruments in the studio and on stage. It is known for its clear sound and handling high sound pressure levels. u003cbru003eBut does the RE320 need a Cloudlifter? When it comes to whether or not an EV RE320 needs a Cloudlifter, the answer is yes. u003cbru003eA Cloudlifter will help give the RE320 the extra boost it needs to be heard clearly in any situation, like during podcasting.
What is RE20 good for?
Firstly, the Electro-Voice RE20 is a cardioid microphone, first released in 197. It is often used for voiceover, radio, and television broadcasts. The RE20 is also famous for studio recording and live sound reinforcement. It is known for its strong output and clarity in the mid and high frequencies.All things considered, the Electro-Voice RE20 is a popular choice for broadcast and voiceover use. It is a cardioid dynamic microphone known for its clear sound and low noise. The RE20 is durable and can handle high sound pressure levels with no phantom power.u003cbru003eIt is a favorite of broadcasters and sound professionals for its clarity, punch, and versatility.u003cbru003eFinally, the RE20 is popular with live sound engineers and used on stage by Bruce Springsteen, Mick Jagger, and Bono.
Final Word
There is no definitive winner when comparing the Re320 and Re20 microphones.
Both microphones have distinct strengths and weaknesses, which ultimately depend on personal preference. Some individuals may favor the warmer sound of the RE20, while others might prefer the more neutral tone of the RE320.
Ultimately, it is the individual’s choice to determine which microphone sounds better.
We hope you enjoyed our comparison of the RE20 and RE320 microphones in our guide, which covers the technology, differences in audio quality, vocal performance, and pricing.
