Moistcr1tikal has discussed the significant difference between his earnings from his top streams on Twitch and YouTube.
He noted that the gap is even larger than many people might expect.
Over the years, various platforms have attempted to challenge Twitch’s dominance as the leading livestreaming service, with YouTube being the most consistent competitor.
As exclusive contracts for streamers are diminishing, many are now streaming on both Twitch and YouTube.
This shift has sparked a renewed debate about which platform is superior – Twitch or YouTube.
Moistcr1tikal, whose real name is Charlie, shared his perspective.
While he primarily uploads his videos to YouTube, he has also streamed on both platforms in the past.
He prefers Twitch for its more interactive chat but acknowledges that YouTube offers a better overall viewing experience.
The income from each platform is a critical factor for streamers when deciding where to stream.
Moistcr1tikal shared his experiences regarding the earnings split between the two platforms.
Reflecting on a memorable Twitch stream, he mentioned when Moist Esports won the Rocket League Major.
He recalled reaching a peak of 75,000 viewers during that stream.
That stream earned him a total of $11,700.
Most of his Twitch revenue came from ads, and he also gained about 2,000 subscriptions, many of which were Prime subscriptions.
In contrast, Moistcr1tikal’s success on YouTube is impressive. He mentioned earning over $84,000 from a Starfield stream.
This was not a single payment; rather, it occurred over different times. He joked about the stream being a challenge to stay awake while playing a game he found mediocre.
During this particular stream, the income breakdown was intriguing. He earned just $1,600 from live ads, with the majority of the remaining amount coming from viewers watching the video afterward.
This illustrates that, despite having fewer live viewers at 31,000, the value of the content can generate significant revenue in the long term through video-on-demand (VOD) views.
Many streamers also collaborate with sponsors, which can provide additional income, but these deals typically extend beyond a single stream.
Consequently, the choice of platform for streaming becomes increasingly important for content creators, considering not only viewer interaction but also potential earnings.
Moistcr1tikal’s insights illuminate the contrasting earnings he experiences on both platforms, emphasizing how streamer preferences may evolve with the changing landscape of online content creation.
