Moistcr1tikal has talked about the big difference between how much he earns from his best streams on Twitch and YouTube.
He pointed out that the gap is even more significant than many people might think.
Over the years, different platforms have tried to take over Twitch’s position as the top livestreaming service, with YouTube being the most consistent competitor.
As exclusive contracts for streamers are fading away, many are now streaming on both Twitch and YouTube.
This change has brought up a renewed discussion about which platform is better – Twitch or YouTube.
Moistcr1tikal, whose real name is Charlie, shared his thoughts.
While he mostly posts his videos on YouTube, he has also streamed on both platforms in the past.
He prefers Twitch for its more engaging chat but admits that YouTube offers a better overall watching experience.
The income from each platform is a crucial factor for streamers when choosing where to stream.
Moistcr1tikal shared his experiences about the earnings split between the two platforms.
Talking about a memorable Twitch stream, he mentioned when Moist Esports won the Rocket League Major.
He recalled that he reached a peak of 75,000 viewers during the stream.
That stream earned him $11,700 total.
Most of his Twitch revenue came from ads, and he also gained about 2,000 subscriptions, many of which were Prime subscriptions.
On the other hand, Moistcr1tikal’s success on YouTube is noteworthy. He mentioned earning over $84,000 for a Starfield stream.
This wasn’t a single payment; rather, it happened across different times. He joked about the stream being a challenge to stay awake while playing a game he found mediocre.
During this particular stream, the income breakdown was interesting. He earned just $1,600 from live ads, with the substantial remaining amount coming from viewers watching the video afterward.
This demonstrates that, despite having fewer live viewers at 31,000, the value of the content can drive significant revenue in the long term through video-on-demand (VOD) views.
Many streamers also work with sponsors, which can provide additional income, but these deals usually last longer than a single stream.
As a result, the choice of platform for streaming becomes increasingly important for content creators, weighing not just viewer interaction but potential earnings as well.
Moistcr1tikal’s insights shed light on the contrasting earnings he experiences on both platforms, highlighting how streamer preferences may evolve with the changing landscape of online content creation.
